

Related Links
Official website of Govt. of Assam - Public Information Officers (Union Govt.) - Public Information Officers (Indian Parliament) - Central Information Commission (CIC) - Directorate of Information & Public Relations Govt. Of Assam
Downloads
RTI Acts & Rules - RTI User's Guide - RTI Acts 2005, FAQ (in Assamese) - RTI Acts 2005, Main Characteristics (in Assamese)
No one is poor by choice or design. Poverty is an inherited curse. Of course, some people become poor through profligacy,
stupidity or greed. While not all the poor are hungry, all the hungry are poor and abjectly so. Hunger is an extreme
deprivation that takes away the spirit and dignity of man enslaving his soul in the perdition of suffering.
The International Food Policy Research Institute’s Global Hunger Index has put India in the 94th position out of 118 countries.
Even Ethiopia manages hunger better than India and it ranks a notch above us at 93. Pakistan too ranks ahead of us at 88 and
China is far ahead at 47. UN FAO in the State of Food Insecurity World Report 2006 finds the largest number of undernourished
people in the globe in India. In its earlier report in 2004, it had shown that India had added more people to the
“newly hungry” in the planet than the rest of the world put together.
The other aspects are that India’s economy is buoyant with over 9% growth rate. The country is awash with money – India
has the fifth largest forex reserve at $ 267 billion, an Indian has reportedly become the richest person in the world,
the sensex is zooming to new heights and consumerism is visibly extensively. NSSO surveys show that people not getting
enough to eat all round or part of the year have fallen from 15% of the population in 1983 to 5-5% in rural areas and
1.9% in urban areas in 1994- 95 and to just 2.6% in rural and 0.6% in urban areas in 2004-05.
These statiscal indicators are of no use to the hungry nor does the rising per capita income or the falling rate of
inflation hold any substance for them - the shrunken, emaciated children of lesser gods who do not know where the next
meal will come from. Their struggle is for survival – for food, shelter and health care. We have them everywhere –
in the slums, streets, railway stations, towns and cities. At a very conservative count they may be anywhere between 2 to 3%
of the population – 20 to 30 million hungry people that exceeds the total population of Australia.
The disparity between poverty and prosperity provides a fertile soil for class conflict. Today out of 600 districts in the
country, the Maoist violence has spread to 157 districts. Our poverty alleviation programs, there are legions of them,
have not made a difference among the poorest in the society. Even Bangladesh has managed the population and
hunger much better. Since it became independent in 1971 its population has nearly doubled but the country has managed
its food shortage creditably. It is close to food sufficiency despite its population density nearly three times ours.
Muhammad Yunus, the winner of the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize, is a Bangladeshi. His book “Banker To The Poor – The Story
Of The Grameen Bank” is an engrossing catalogue of poverty and religious orthodoxy in his country and the
struggle and suffering that he faced along the way in his endeavor to make a change in their lives. It provides
the hands-on approach to uplift the lowest-rung of the deprived ladder through empowering the women in a
country with strong religious and social bias against women. It is a miracle that he succeeded and made it a
thriving entrepreneurial pursuit to create a new awakening among the millions of under-privileged citizens.
It has proved that freedom from poverty also implies freedom from social slavery.
Women who had never experienced handling any money, who could not read or write, who had never communicated with
other men than their immediate family members, women enslaved by tradition, poverty and exploitation became his
clients and improved their miserable lot. By using micro-credits, they could feed the family, build shelter over their heads,
send children to schools and provide them with health care and food security – all that sound like the fairy tales,
but it has happened and it is happening.
Grameen movement began in 1976 with Yunus providing the first loan of 856 takas - $ 27- from his pocket to 42
destitute women. Amid resistance and opposition by vested interest groups, the disbursements reached the firs one
billion dollar in 18 years. Its benefits so encouraged the poor that the next one billion dollar was disbursed
in just 27 months in 1998 and it reached to 2.3 million borrowers in 38551 villages.
Small is both beautiful and bountiful. The smallest loan given by Grameen was 30 takas or 75 US cents to a woman.
In 22 years, its loan disbursements exceeded the total amount of rural loans disbursed by all other banks in Bangladesh.
Now it is disbursing billions of dollars every year through its extended schemes like Grameen phones, housing, retirement,
health-care etc besides bank and it is replicated all over the world - not only in the third world but also in the developed
countries because there too exist pockets of poverty.
Grameen targets 25% of the extremely poor of whom 98% are women. They do not come to the bank. The bank goes to the poor,
stays with them, persuades them to take loans without guarantee or collateral and guides them what to with it. The repayment
schedules are spread on weekly basis depending on the income generated by the loan. There is almost cent percent repayment
which proves that the poorest is much more credit worthy than well-to-dos. It also demonstrates that women have better
accountability in financial management.
Muhammad Yunus has really proved that so much can be done for so many by so few who are committed to a cause.
He is personally rich but committed to mitigate the tyranny of hunger and the impact of poverty on humanity.
He works for the poor, lives with them and stands by them.
The poor of Yunus are not marginally poor but abjectly poor like the beggars, weavers, pushcart operators,
daily wage earners, rickshaw peddlers and the jobless who are born hungry and who die in the prison of hunger.
They do not have the capital to invest in the tools that generate income; for them life is a hell on earth.
Their children too follow the same cycle of wretched existence. They are the left-outs of our poverty alleviation schemes.
We spend huge amounts in the forms of doles, grants and subsidies, which do not improve their lot. It is like giving alms
to the beggar with a sense of sympathy without realizing that by doing so you are only helping to perpetuate his hopeless
existence. As the Chinese adage goes if you give a fish to a person he will eat it once, but if you teach him how to fish
he will eat it lifetime. We need to empower the needy to help themselves with dignity and hope.
Let our banks – the rural credit oriented banks in particular - train and motivate their staff to work with missionary zeal
for the poorest and let the banks go to them offering micro-credits with which they can generate income according to
their own ability. Economists and planners can create wealth but they cannot remove human destitution resulting from
lack of commitment to the poorest. It has to be done at micro-level.
Poverty and hunger are the worst form of human disaster. We need to reach out to them as we do to the victims of
natural disasters. More importantly, we need to reach them with our hearts and empathy as Yunus and his team is doing.
The writer, a former Director General of Police in Kerala and Director General of the National Security Guard and
the Border Security Force, is currently the State Chief Information Commissioner, Assam)